Columbia 22 vs Columbia 36
How do the Columbia 22 and Columbia 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Columbia 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 35.8 ft10.90 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 27.8 ft8.46 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 12,000 lb5,443 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 556 ft²51.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 16.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 251 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 26.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 1.83 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 7.1 |
Columbia 22 vs Columbia 36: the short version
- The Columbia 36 is the larger boat at 35.8 ft10.90 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Columbia 22.
- The Columbia 36 is heavier, displacing about 445% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 17.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 36 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.