Columbia 22 vs Columbia 7.6
How do the Columbia 22 and Columbia 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Columbia 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 25.1 ft7.64 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 20.7 ft6.30 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 9.2 ft2.80 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 314 ft²29.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 18.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 227 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 16.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.1 |
Columbia 22 vs Columbia 7.6: the short version
- The Columbia 7.6 is the larger boat at 25.1 ft7.64 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Columbia 22.
- The Columbia 7.6 is heavier, displacing about 105% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 7.6 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 7.6 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.