Columbia 22 vs Com-Pac 25
How do the Columbia 22 and Com-Pac 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Com-Pac 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 28.2 ft8.59 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 14.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 18.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.1 |
Columbia 22 vs Com-Pac 25: the short version
- The Com-Pac 25 is the larger boat at 28.2 ft8.59 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Columbia 22.
- The Com-Pac 25 is heavier, displacing about 118% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 25 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.