Columbia 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22
How do the Columbia 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Falmouth Cutter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 13.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 366 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 33.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 1.64 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.1 |
Columbia 22 vs Falmouth Cutter 22: the short version
- The Columbia 22 and Falmouth Cutter 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 is heavier, displacing about 236% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 13.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Falmouth Cutter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Falmouth Cutter 22 rates better for offshore work (1.64 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.