Columbia 22 vs Freedom 35
How do the Columbia 22 and Freedom 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Freedom 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 35.4 ft10.79 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 29.9 ft9.11 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 14,611 lb6,627 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 4,465 lb2,025 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 609 ft²56.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 16.30 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 244 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 26.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 7.3 |
Columbia 22 vs Freedom 35: the short version
- The Freedom 35 is the larger boat at 35.4 ft10.79 m LOA versus 22.0 ft6.71 m for the Columbia 22.
- The Freedom 35 is heavier, displacing about 564% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 22 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 16.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Freedom 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Freedom 35 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.