Columbia 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket
How do the Columbia 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Laminex Pocket Rocket | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 2,400 lb1,089 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,100 lb499 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 258 ft²24.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 23.03 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 108 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 2.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
Columbia 22 vs Laminex Pocket Rocket: the short version
- The Columbia 22 and Laminex Pocket Rocket are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Laminex Pocket Rocket is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Laminex Pocket Rocket carries the more powerful rig (23.0 vs 21.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 22 rates better for offshore work (2.38 vs 2.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.