Columbia 22 vs Rocket 22
How do the Columbia 22 and Rocket 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 22 | Columbia 22 | Rocket 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.0 ft6.71 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.5 ft2.58 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 5.7 ft1.73 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 232 ft²21.6 m² | 313 ft²29.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.94 | 36.61 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 72 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.8 | 6.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.38 | 2.90 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
Columbia 22 vs Rocket 22: the short version
- The Columbia 22 and Rocket 22 are close in length (22.0 ft6.71 m vs 22.0 ft6.71 m ).
- The Columbia 22 is heavier, displacing about 38% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Rocket 22 carries the more powerful rig (36.6 vs 21.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 22 rates better for offshore work (2.38 vs 2.90).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.