Columbia 24 Challenger vs Com-Pac 25
How do the Columbia 24 Challenger and Com-Pac 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 24 Challenger | Columbia 24 Challenger | Com-Pac 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.3 ft7.42 m | 28.2 ft8.59 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.49 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft1.01 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 3,930 lb1,783 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Ballast | 1,800 lb816 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 288 ft²26.8 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.50 | 14.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 301 | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.1 | 18.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.03 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 6.1 |
Columbia 24 Challenger vs Com-Pac 25: the short version
- The Com-Pac 25 is the larger boat at 28.2 ft8.59 m LOA versus 24.3 ft7.42 m for the Columbia 24 Challenger.
- The Com-Pac 25 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 24 Challenger carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 24 Challenger scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 25 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.