Columbia 24 Contender vs Com-Pac 25
How do the Columbia 24 Contender and Com-Pac 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 24 Contender | Columbia 24 Contender | Com-Pac 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.0 ft7.32 m | 28.2 ft8.59 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.56 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.39 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.3 ft0.99 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 3,600 lb1,633 kg | 4,800 lb2,177 kg |
| Ballast | 1,600 lb726 kg | 1,900 lb862 kg |
| Sail area | 288 ft²26.8 m² | 265 ft²24.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.62 | 14.90 |
| Displacement / Length | 264 | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.0 | 18.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.02 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 6.1 |
Columbia 24 Contender vs Com-Pac 25: the short version
- The Com-Pac 25 is the larger boat at 28.2 ft8.59 m LOA versus 24.0 ft7.32 m for the Columbia 24 Contender.
- The Com-Pac 25 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 24 Contender carries the more powerful rig (19.6 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 25 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.