Columbia 32 vs Columbia T-23
How do the Columbia 32 and Columbia T-23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 32 | Columbia 32 | Columbia T-23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.1 ft9.78 m | 22.6 ft6.88 m |
| Waterline length | 26.5 ft8.08 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 1.1 ft0.33 m |
| Displacement | 9,450 lb4,286 kg | 2,300 lb1,043 kg |
| Ballast | 4,050 lb1,837 kg | 810 lb367 kg |
| Sail area | 515 ft²47.8 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.43 | 20.02 |
| Displacement / Length | 227 | 128 |
| Comfort ratio | 25.8 | 10.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 6.0 |
Columbia 32 vs Columbia T-23: the short version
- The Columbia 32 is the larger boat at 32.1 ft9.78 m LOA versus 22.6 ft6.88 m for the Columbia T-23.
- The Columbia 32 is heavier, displacing about 311% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia T-23 carries the more powerful rig (20.0 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Columbia 32 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Columbia 32 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.