Columbia 36 vs Frigate 36
How do the Columbia 36 and Frigate 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 36 
Frigate 36 | Columbia 36 | Frigate 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.8 ft10.90 m | 35.7 ft10.87 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 24.4 ft7.44 m |
| Beam | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 10.2 ft3.11 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 7.2 ft2.18 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 11,575 lb5,250 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 5,200 lb2,359 kg |
| Sail area | 556 ft²51.7 m² | 511 ft²47.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.97 | 15.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 355 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.8 | 29.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.80 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 6.6 |
Columbia 36 vs Frigate 36: the short version
- The Columbia 36 and Frigate 36 are close in length (35.8 ft10.90 m vs 35.7 ft10.87 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 36 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Frigate 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Frigate 36 rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.