Columbia 36 vs Hughes-Columbia 36
How do the Columbia 36 and Hughes-Columbia 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 36 | Columbia 36 | Hughes-Columbia 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.8 ft10.90 m | 35.8 ft10.92 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 28.0 ft8.53 m |
| Beam | 10.5 ft3.20 m | 10.2 ft3.10 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 15,000 lb6,804 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 6,300 lb2,858 kg |
| Sail area | 556 ft²51.7 m² | 525 ft²48.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.97 | 13.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 305 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.8 | 34.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.1 |
Columbia 36 vs Hughes-Columbia 36: the short version
- The Columbia 36 and Hughes-Columbia 36 are close in length (35.8 ft10.90 m vs 35.8 ft10.92 m ).
- The Hughes-Columbia 36 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia 36 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 13.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hughes-Columbia 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hughes-Columbia 36 rates better for offshore work (1.65 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.