Columbia 38 vs Eagle 38
How do the Columbia 38 and Eagle 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia 38 
Eagle 38 | Columbia 38 | Eagle 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 38.9 ft11.86 m | 38.6 ft11.77 m |
| Waterline length | 25.8 ft7.85 m | —— |
| Beam | 10.7 ft3.25 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Draft | 5.8 ft1.75 m | 4.1 ft1.25 m |
| Displacement | 14,000 lb6,350 kg | 8,378 lb3,800 kg |
| Ballast | 6,400 lb2,903 kg | 2,976 lb1,350 kg |
| Sail area | 650 ft²60.4 m² | 644 ft²59.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.90 | 24.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 366 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 31.1 | — |
| Capsize screening | 1.77 | 1.68 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | — |
Columbia 38 vs Eagle 38: the short version
- The Columbia 38 and Eagle 38 are close in length (38.9 ft11.86 m vs 38.6 ft11.77 m ).
- The Columbia 38 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Eagle 38 carries the more powerful rig (25.0 vs 17.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Eagle 38 rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 1.77).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.