Columbia T-23 vs Monark 700
How do the Columbia T-23 and Monark 700 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Columbia T-23 | Columbia T-23 | Monark 700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.6 ft6.88 m | 22.6 ft6.90 m |
| Waterline length | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 1.1 ft0.33 m | 4.3 ft1.32 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 3,086 lb1,400 kg |
| Ballast | 810 lb367 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Sail area | 218 ft²20.3 m² | 231 ft²21.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.02 | 17.44 |
| Displacement / Length | 128 | 180 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.9 | 14.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.40 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | — | €4,500 |
Columbia T-23 vs Monark 700: the short version
- The Columbia T-23 and Monark 700 are close in length (22.6 ft6.88 m vs 22.6 ft6.90 m ).
- The Monark 700 is heavier, displacing about 34% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Columbia T-23 carries the more powerful rig (20.0 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Monark 700 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Monark 700 rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.