Com-pac 16 vs COM-PAC 19
How do the Com-pac 16 and COM-PAC 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-pac 16 
COM-PAC 19 | Com-pac 16 | COM-PAC 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 20.1 ft6.12 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 16.3 ft4.98 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 1.5 ft0.46 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | 800 lb363 kg |
| Sail area | 120 ft²11.1 m² | 153 ft²14.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.02 | 15.42 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 13.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.32 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.4 |
Com-pac 16 vs COM-PAC 19: the short version
- The COM-PAC 19 is the larger boat at 20.1 ft6.12 m LOA versus 16.0 ft4.88 m for the Com-pac 16.
- The COM-PAC 19 is heavier, displacing about 82% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-pac 16 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The COM-PAC 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the COM-PAC 19 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.32).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.