Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac 23
How do the Com-pac 16 and Com-Pac 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-pac 16 
Com-Pac 23 | Com-pac 16 | Com-Pac 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 22.8 ft6.93 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 20.2 ft6.15 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 7.8 ft2.39 m |
| Draft | 1.5 ft0.46 m | 2.3 ft0.69 m |
| Displacement | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,900 lb1,315 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | 1,340 lb608 kg |
| Sail area | 120 ft²11.1 m² | 206 ft²19.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.02 | 16.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 158 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 13.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.32 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 6.0 |
Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac 23: the short version
- The Com-Pac 23 is the larger boat at 22.8 ft6.93 m LOA versus 16.0 ft4.88 m for the Com-pac 16.
- The Com-Pac 23 is heavier, displacing about 164% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-pac 16 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 23 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.32).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.