Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac Eclipse
How do the Com-pac 16 and Com-Pac Eclipse compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-pac 16 
Com-Pac Eclipse | Com-pac 16 | Com-Pac Eclipse | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 18.1 ft5.51 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 7.3 ft2.23 m |
| Draft | 1.5 ft0.46 m | 5.2 ft1.57 m |
| Displacement | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,200 lb998 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | 120 ft²11.1 m² | 158 ft²14.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.02 | 14.94 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 166 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.32 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.7 |
Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac Eclipse: the short version
- The Com-Pac Eclipse is the larger boat at 21.3 ft6.50 m LOA versus 16.0 ft4.88 m for the Com-pac 16.
- The Com-Pac Eclipse is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-pac 16 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Eclipse scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Eclipse rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.32).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.