Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac Horizon Cat
How do the Com-pac 16 and Com-Pac Horizon Cat compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-pac 16 
Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Com-pac 16 | Com-Pac Horizon Cat | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 17.8 ft5.41 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 1.5 ft0.46 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 1,100 lb499 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 120 ft²11.1 m² | 205 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.02 | 17.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 12.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.32 | 2.46 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.6 |
Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac Horizon Cat: the short version
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is the larger boat at 20.0 ft6.10 m LOA versus 16.0 ft4.88 m for the Com-pac 16.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is heavier, displacing about 127% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-pac 16 carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-pac 16 rates better for offshore work (2.32 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.