Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac Sun Cat
How do the Com-pac 16 and Com-Pac Sun Cat compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-pac 16 
Com-Pac Sun Cat | Com-pac 16 | Com-Pac Sun Cat | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 17.3 ft5.28 m |
| Waterline length | 14.0 ft4.27 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 7.3 ft2.21 m |
| Draft | 1.5 ft0.46 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,500 lb680 kg |
| Ballast | 450 lb204 kg | 200 lb91 kg |
| Sail area | 120 ft²11.1 m² | 150 ft²13.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.02 | 18.32 |
| Displacement / Length | 179 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.7 | 10.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.32 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.0 | 5.2 |
Com-pac 16 vs Com-Pac Sun Cat: the short version
- The Com-Pac Sun Cat is the larger boat at 17.3 ft5.28 m LOA versus 16.0 ft4.88 m for the Com-pac 16.
- The Com-Pac Sun Cat is heavier, displacing about 36% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac Sun Cat carries the more powerful rig (18.3 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-pac 16 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-pac 16 rates better for offshore work (2.32 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.