COM-PAC 19 vs Com-Pac 23
How do the COM-PAC 19 and Com-Pac 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
COM-PAC 19 
Com-Pac 23 | COM-PAC 19 | Com-Pac 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 22.8 ft6.93 m |
| Waterline length | 16.3 ft4.98 m | 20.2 ft6.15 m |
| Beam | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 7.8 ft2.39 m |
| Draft | 2.0 ft0.61 m | 2.3 ft0.69 m |
| Displacement | 2,000 lb907 kg | 2,900 lb1,315 kg |
| Ballast | 800 lb363 kg | 1,340 lb608 kg |
| Sail area | 153 ft²14.2 m² | 206 ft²19.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.42 | 16.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 158 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.3 | 13.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.20 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.4 | 6.0 |
COM-PAC 19 vs Com-Pac 23: the short version
- The Com-Pac 23 is the larger boat at 22.8 ft6.93 m LOA versus 20.1 ft6.12 m for the COM-PAC 19.
- The Com-Pac 23 is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac 23 carries the more powerful rig (16.2 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 23 rates better for offshore work (2.20 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.