Com-Pac 23 vs Rob Roy 23
How do the Com-Pac 23 and Rob Roy 23 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac 23 
Rob Roy 23 | Com-Pac 23 | Rob Roy 23 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.8 ft6.93 m | 22.7 ft6.91 m |
| Waterline length | 20.2 ft6.15 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.39 m | 6.9 ft2.11 m |
| Draft | 2.3 ft0.69 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 2,900 lb1,315 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Ballast | 1,340 lb608 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 206 ft²19.1 m² | 255 ft²23.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.21 | 20.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 158 | 135 |
| Comfort ratio | 13.8 | 15.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 1.96 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.1 |
Com-Pac 23 vs Rob Roy 23: the short version
- The Com-Pac 23 and Rob Roy 23 are close in length (22.8 ft6.93 m vs 22.7 ft6.91 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Rob Roy 23 carries the more powerful rig (20.5 vs 16.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Rob Roy 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rob Roy 23 rates better for offshore work (1.96 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.