Com-Pac 25 vs Omega 28
How do the Com-Pac 25 and Omega 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac 25 | Com-Pac 25 | Omega 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.2 ft8.59 m | 28.1 ft8.57 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 22.3 ft6.80 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 9.6 ft2.93 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 5,952 lb2,700 kg |
| Ballast | 1,900 lb862 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 265 ft²24.6 m² | 441 ft²41.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.90 | 21.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 231 | 239 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 2.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.3 |
| Average used price | — | €7,100 |
Com-Pac 25 vs Omega 28: the short version
- The Com-Pac 25 and Omega 28 are close in length (28.2 ft8.59 m vs 28.1 ft8.57 m ).
- The Omega 28 is heavier, displacing about 24% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Omega 28 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Omega 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac 25 rates better for offshore work (2.02 vs 2.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.