Com-Pac 25 vs Viking 28
How do the Com-Pac 25 and Viking 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac 25 
Viking 28 | Com-Pac 25 | Viking 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.2 ft8.59 m | 28.2 ft8.59 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 22.0 ft6.71 m |
| Beam | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 8.4 ft2.55 m |
| Draft | 2.5 ft0.76 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 4,800 lb2,177 kg | 4,775 lb2,166 kg |
| Ballast | 1,900 lb862 kg | 2,250 lb1,021 kg |
| Sail area | 265 ft²24.6 m² | 317 ft²29.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.90 | 17.89 |
| Displacement / Length | 231 | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.5 | 18.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.3 |
Com-Pac 25 vs Viking 28: the short version
- The Com-Pac 25 and Viking 28 are close in length (28.2 ft8.59 m vs 28.2 ft8.59 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Viking 28 carries the more powerful rig (17.9 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Viking 28 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.