Com-Pac Eclipse vs Com-Pac Legacy
How do the Com-Pac Eclipse and Com-Pac Legacy compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Com-Pac Eclipse | Com-Pac Legacy | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 16.5 ft5.03 m |
| Waterline length | 18.1 ft5.51 m | 14.3 ft4.34 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.23 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.57 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Ballast | 700 lb318 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 158 ft²14.7 m² | 130 ft²12.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.94 | 20.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 166 | 154 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 9.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.1 |
Com-Pac Eclipse vs Com-Pac Legacy: the short version
- The Com-Pac Eclipse is the larger boat at 21.3 ft6.50 m LOA versus 16.5 ft5.03 m for the Com-Pac Legacy.
- The Com-Pac Eclipse is heavier, displacing about 120% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac Legacy carries the more powerful rig (20.8 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Eclipse scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Eclipse rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.40).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.