Com-Pac Eclipse vs Junker 22
How do the Com-Pac Eclipse and Junker 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Eclipse | Com-Pac Eclipse | Junker 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 18.1 ft5.51 m | 18.0 ft5.50 m |
| Beam | 7.3 ft2.23 m | 6.6 ft2.00 m |
| Draft | 5.2 ft1.57 m | —— |
| Displacement | 2,200 lb998 kg | 2,866 lb1,300 kg |
| Ballast | 700 lb318 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 158 ft²14.7 m² | 205 ft²19.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.94 | 16.26 |
| Displacement / Length | 166 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.6 | 19.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.25 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.7 |
| Average used price | — | €1,500 |
Com-Pac Eclipse vs Junker 22: the short version
- The Com-Pac Eclipse and Junker 22 are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- The Junker 22 is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Junker 22 carries the more powerful rig (16.3 vs 14.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Junker 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Junker 22 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.