Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Com-Pac Legacy
How do the Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Com-Pac Legacy compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Com-Pac Legacy | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 16.5 ft5.03 m |
| Waterline length | 17.8 ft5.41 m | 14.3 ft4.34 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Ballast | 600 lb272 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 130 ft²12.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.81 | 20.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 154 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 9.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.40 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.1 |
Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Com-Pac Legacy: the short version
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is the larger boat at 20.0 ft6.10 m LOA versus 16.5 ft5.03 m for the Com-Pac Legacy.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is heavier, displacing about 150% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac Legacy carries the more powerful rig (20.8 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Legacy rates better for offshore work (2.40 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.