Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Conrad 20
How do the Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Conrad 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Conrad 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 17.8 ft5.41 m | 17.9 ft5.45 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 6.8 ft2.06 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 1,874 lb850 kg |
| Ballast | 600 lb272 kg | 772 lb350 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 180 ft²16.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.81 | 18.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 146 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 12.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 2.19 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.7 |
| Average used price | — | €1,900 |
Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Conrad 20: the short version
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Conrad 20 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Conrad 20 carries the more powerful rig (18.9 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Conrad 20 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.