Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Cracksman 20
How do the Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Cracksman 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Horizon Cat 
Cracksman 20 | Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Cracksman 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 17.8 ft5.41 m | 16.0 ft4.88 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | —— |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 1,151 lb522 kg |
| Ballast | 600 lb272 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 17.81 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 125 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 6.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 3.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.4 |
Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Cracksman 20: the short version
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Cracksman 20 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is heavier, displacing about 117% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Horizon Cat rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.06).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.