Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Flicka 20
How do the Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Flicka 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Flicka 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 17.8 ft5.41 m | 18.2 ft5.54 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Ballast | 600 lb272 kg | 1,720 lb780 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 250 ft²23.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.81 | 12.84 |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 409 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 28.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.7 |
Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Flicka 20: the short version
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Flicka 20 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Flicka 20 is heavier, displacing about 120% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Com-Pac Horizon Cat carries the more powerful rig (17.8 vs 12.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Flicka 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Flicka 20 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.46).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.