Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Flying 15
How do the Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Flying 15 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Horizon Cat %20(cropped).jpg?width=960)
Flying 15 | Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Flying 15 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 17.8 ft5.41 m | 15.0 ft4.57 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 725 lb329 kg |
| Ballast | 600 lb272 kg | 372 lb169 kg |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 142 ft²13.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.81 | 28.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 96 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 5.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 3.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.2 |
Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Flying 15: the short version
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Flying 15 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is heavier, displacing about 245% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying 15 carries the more powerful rig (28.2 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Horizon Cat rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.