Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Flying Dutchman
How do the Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Flying Dutchman compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Horizon Cat 
Flying Dutchman | Com-Pac Horizon Cat | Flying Dutchman | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 19.9 ft6.06 m |
| Waterline length | 17.8 ft5.41 m | 18.0 ft5.50 m |
| Beam | 8.3 ft2.54 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 3.7 ft1.12 m |
| Displacement | 2,500 lb1,134 kg | 364 lb165 kg |
| Ballast | 600 lb272 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 205 ft²19.0 m² | 183 ft²17.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.81 | 57.43 |
| Displacement / Length | 200 | 28 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.4 | 2.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.46 | 3.27 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.7 |
Com-Pac Horizon Cat vs Flying Dutchman: the short version
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat and Flying Dutchman are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 19.9 ft6.06 m ).
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat is heavier, displacing about 587% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Flying Dutchman carries the more powerful rig (57.4 vs 17.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Horizon Cat scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Horizon Cat rates better for offshore work (2.46 vs 3.27).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.