Com-Pac Legacy vs G-Cat 5.0
How do the Com-Pac Legacy and G-Cat 5.0 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Legacy | Com-Pac Legacy | G-Cat 5.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.5 ft5.03 m | 16.7 ft5.08 m |
| Waterline length | 14.3 ft4.34 m | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 1.1 ft0.33 m |
| Displacement | 1,000 lb454 kg | 340 lb154 kg |
| Ballast | 400 lb181 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 130 ft²12.1 m² | 210 ft²19.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.80 | 68.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 41 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.5 | 2.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.40 | 4.58 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.3 |
Com-Pac Legacy vs G-Cat 5.0: the short version
- The Com-Pac Legacy and G-Cat 5.0 are close in length (16.5 ft5.03 m vs 16.7 ft5.08 m ).
- The Com-Pac Legacy is heavier, displacing about 194% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the G-Cat 5.0 carries the more powerful rig (69.0 vs 20.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Legacy scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Legacy rates better for offshore work (2.40 vs 4.58).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.