Com-Pac Legacy vs Hartley TS16/18/21
How do the Com-Pac Legacy and Hartley TS16/18/21 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Com-Pac Legacy | Com-Pac Legacy | Hartley TS16/18/21 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.5 ft5.03 m | 16.4 ft5.00 m |
| Waterline length | 14.3 ft4.34 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Beam | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Draft | 3.5 ft1.07 m | 4.1 ft1.24 m |
| Displacement | 1,000 lb454 kg | 794 lb360 kg |
| Ballast | 400 lb181 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 130 ft²12.1 m² | 149 ft²13.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.80 | 27.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.5 | 6.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.40 | 3.12 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Com-Pac Legacy vs Hartley TS16/18/21: the short version
- The Com-Pac Legacy and Hartley TS16/18/21 are close in length (16.5 ft5.03 m vs 16.4 ft5.00 m ).
- The Com-Pac Legacy is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hartley TS16/18/21 carries the more powerful rig (27.8 vs 20.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Com-Pac Legacy scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Com-Pac Legacy rates better for offshore work (2.40 vs 3.12).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.