Comet vs Phantom 16
How do the Comet and Phantom 16 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Comet | Comet | Phantom 16 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 16.0 ft4.88 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Waterline length | 15.0 ft4.57 m | —— |
| Beam | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 7.5 ft2.30 m |
| Draft | 1.8 ft0.53 m | 1.5 ft0.46 m |
| Displacement | 260 lb118 kg | 265 lb120 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 135 ft²12.5 m² | 301 ft²28.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 53.02 | 116.73 |
| Displacement / Length | 34 | — |
| Comfort ratio | 2.7 | — |
| Capsize screening | 3.45 | 4.70 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.2 | — |
Comet vs Phantom 16: the short version
- The Comet and Phantom 16 are close in length (16.0 ft4.88 m vs 15.9 ft4.85 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Phantom 16 carries the more powerful rig (116.7 vs 53.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Comet rates better for offshore work (3.45 vs 4.70).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.