Comfort 30 vs Grampian 30
How do the Comfort 30 and Grampian 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Comfort 30 
Grampian 30 | Comfort 30 | Grampian 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.8 ft9.09 m | 29.8 ft9.07 m |
| Waterline length | 23.2 ft7.07 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Beam | 9.9 ft3.03 m | 9.5 ft2.90 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 7,055 lb3,200 kg | 8,600 lb3,901 kg |
| Ballast | 3,086 lb1,400 kg | 3,870 lb1,755 kg |
| Sail area | 635 ft²59.0 m² | 389 ft²36.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 27.62 | 14.83 |
| Displacement / Length | 252 | 232 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.3 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.07 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.8 |
| Average used price | €13,000 | — |
Comfort 30 vs Grampian 30: the short version
- The Comfort 30 and Grampian 30 are close in length (29.8 ft9.09 m vs 29.8 ft9.07 m ).
- The Grampian 30 is heavier, displacing about 22% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Comfort 30 carries the more powerful rig (27.6 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Grampian 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Grampian 30 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.