Compis 28 vs Hunter 28
How do the Compis 28 and Hunter 28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Compis 28 
Hunter 28 | Compis 28 | Hunter 28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.1 ft8.56 m | 28.0 ft8.54 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.10 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.51 m | 3.8 ft1.14 m |
| Displacement | 6,614 lb3,000 kg | 7,400 lb3,357 kg |
| Ballast | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 2,800 lb1,270 kg |
| Sail area | 474 ft²44.0 m² | 399 ft²37.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.52 | 16.81 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.1 | 19.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.99 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Average used price | €5,500 | — |
Compis 28 vs Hunter 28: the short version
- The Compis 28 and Hunter 28 are close in length (28.1 ft8.56 m vs 28.0 ft8.54 m ).
- The Hunter 28 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Compis 28 carries the more powerful rig (21.5 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Compis 28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Compis 28 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.