Conrad 20 vs Tornado
How do the Conrad 20 and Tornado compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Conrad 20 
Tornado | Conrad 20 | Tornado | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | 17.9 ft5.45 m | 19.2 ft5.84 m |
| Beam | 6.8 ft2.06 m | 10.1 ft3.08 m |
| Draft | 3.6 ft1.10 m | 2.5 ft0.76 m |
| Displacement | 1,874 lb850 kg | 342 lb155 kg |
| Ballast | 772 lb350 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 236 ft²21.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.95 | 77.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 146 | 22 |
| Comfort ratio | 12.3 | 1.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.19 | 5.78 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €1,900 | — |
Conrad 20 vs Tornado: the short version
- The Conrad 20 and Tornado are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Conrad 20 is heavier, displacing about 448% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Tornado carries the more powerful rig (77.2 vs 18.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Conrad 20 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Conrad 20 rates better for offshore work (2.19 vs 5.78).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.