Contessa 26 vs Facil 26
How do the Contessa 26 and Facil 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Contessa 26 | Contessa 26 | Facil 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.6 ft7.81 m |
| Waterline length | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 20.1 ft6.13 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.20 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 5,291 lb2,400 kg | 4,630 lb2,100 kg |
| Ballast | 2,293 lb1,040 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 301 ft²28.0 m² | 366 ft²34.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.86 | 21.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 255 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.7 | 17.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.73 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €5,000 |
Contessa 26 vs Facil 26: the short version
- The Contessa 26 and Facil 26 are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.6 ft7.81 m ).
- The Contessa 26 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Facil 26 carries the more powerful rig (21.1 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Contessa 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Contessa 26 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.