Contest 25 OC vs MacGregor 24
How do the Contest 25 OC and MacGregor 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Contest 25 OC 
MacGregor 24 | Contest 25 OC | MacGregor 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.6 ft7.50 m | 24.6 ft7.49 m |
| Waterline length | 20.5 ft6.25 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.75 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,788 lb1,718 kg | 2,100 lb953 kg |
| Ballast | 1,510 lb685 kg | 575 lb261 kg |
| Sail area | 306 ft²28.4 m² | 231 ft²21.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.15 | 22.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 196 | 97 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.4 | 9.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.31 | 2.47 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.2 |
Contest 25 OC vs MacGregor 24: the short version
- The Contest 25 OC and MacGregor 24 are close in length (24.6 ft7.50 m vs 24.6 ft7.49 m ).
- The Contest 25 OC is heavier, displacing about 80% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the MacGregor 24 carries the more powerful rig (22.5 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Contest 25 OC scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Contest 25 OC rates better for offshore work (2.31 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.