Contest 32 CS vs Morgan 32
How do the Contest 32 CS and Morgan 32 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Contest 32 CS | Contest 32 CS | Morgan 32 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.8 ft9.70 m | 31.9 ft9.73 m |
| Waterline length | 25.7 ft7.82 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Beam | 10.9 ft3.32 m | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 14,300 lb6,486 kg | 11,000 lb4,990 kg |
| Ballast | 6,380 lb2,894 kg | 4,000 lb1,814 kg |
| Sail area | 289 ft²26.8 m² | 493 ft²45.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 7.85 | 15.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 378 | 314 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.4 | 24.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.79 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.8 | 6.7 |
Contest 32 CS vs Morgan 32: the short version
- The Contest 32 CS and Morgan 32 are close in length (31.8 ft9.70 m vs 31.9 ft9.73 m ).
- The Contest 32 CS is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Morgan 32 carries the more powerful rig (15.9 vs 7.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Contest 32 CS scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Contest 32 CS rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.