Contrast 33 vs Swan 40 Frers
How do the Contrast 33 and Swan 40 Frers compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Contrast 33 | Contrast 33 | Swan 40 Frers | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.3 ft9.85 m | 32.4 ft9.88 m |
| Waterline length | 27.2 ft8.30 m | 32.4 ft9.88 m |
| Beam | 10.1 ft3.07 m | 12.9 ft3.94 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 7.0 ft2.15 m |
| Displacement | 9,259 lb4,200 kg | 19,401 lb8,800 kg |
| Ballast | 3,748 lb1,700 kg | 6,990 lb3,171 kg |
| Sail area | 614 ft²57.0 m² | 830 ft²77.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.28 | 18.39 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 254 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.0 | 30.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.6 |
| Average used price | €28,000 | — |
Contrast 33 vs Swan 40 Frers: the short version
- The Contrast 33 and Swan 40 Frers are close in length (32.3 ft9.85 m vs 32.4 ft9.88 m ).
- The Swan 40 Frers is heavier, displacing about 110% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Contrast 33 carries the more powerful rig (22.3 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 40 Frers scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Contrast 33 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.