Corbin 39 vs Marlow-Hunter 42SS
How do the Corbin 39 and Marlow-Hunter 42SS compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Corbin 39 | Corbin 39 | Marlow-Hunter 42SS | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.5 ft12.65 m | 41.3 ft12.57 m |
| Waterline length | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Beam | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 13.2 ft4.01 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.7 ft2.03 m |
| Displacement | 22,800 lb10,342 kg | 19,098 lb8,663 kg |
| Ballast | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 5,425 lb2,461 kg |
| Sail area | 811 ft²75.3 m² | 970 ft²90.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.14 | 21.72 |
| Displacement / Length | 311 | 183 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.6 | 25.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.70 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 8.0 |
Corbin 39 vs Marlow-Hunter 42SS: the short version
- The Corbin 39 and Marlow-Hunter 42SS are close in length (41.5 ft12.65 m vs 41.3 ft12.57 m ).
- The Corbin 39 is heavier, displacing about 19% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 42SS carries the more powerful rig (21.7 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Corbin 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corbin 39 rates better for offshore work (1.70 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.