Corbin 39 vs Redline 41
How do the Corbin 39 and Redline 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Corbin 39 | Corbin 39 | Redline 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 41.5 ft12.65 m | 41.4 ft12.62 m |
| Waterline length | 32.0 ft9.75 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Beam | 12.1 ft3.68 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Draft | 5.5 ft1.68 m | 6.3 ft1.92 m |
| Displacement | 22,800 lb10,342 kg | 19,475 lb8,834 kg |
| Ballast | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 9,500 lb4,309 kg |
| Sail area | 811 ft²75.3 m² | 776 ft²72.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.14 | 17.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 311 | 322 |
| Comfort ratio | 36.6 | 36.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.70 | 1.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.6 | 7.3 |
Corbin 39 vs Redline 41: the short version
- The Corbin 39 and Redline 41 are close in length (41.5 ft12.65 m vs 41.4 ft12.62 m ).
- The Corbin 39 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Redline 41 carries the more powerful rig (17.2 vs 16.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Corbin 39 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Redline 41 rates better for offshore work (1.66 vs 1.70).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.