Core Sound 20 Mark 3 vs Flicka 20
How do the Core Sound 20 Mark 3 and Flicka 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Core Sound 20 Mark 3 
Flicka 20 | Core Sound 20 Mark 3 | Flicka 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.0 ft6.10 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 18.2 ft5.54 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.99 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 3.9 ft1.20 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 1,500 lb680 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Ballast | 438 lb199 kg | 1,720 lb780 kg |
| Sail area | 180 ft²16.7 m² | 250 ft²23.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.98 | 12.84 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 409 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 28.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 1.81 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 5.7 |
Core Sound 20 Mark 3 vs Flicka 20: the short version
- The Core Sound 20 Mark 3 and Flicka 20 are close in length (20.0 ft6.10 m vs 20.0 ft6.10 m ).
- The Flicka 20 is heavier, displacing about 267% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Core Sound 20 Mark 3 carries the more powerful rig (22.0 vs 12.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Flicka 20 rates better for offshore work (1.81 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.