Corinthian 19 vs Halman 20
How do the Corinthian 19 and Halman 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Corinthian 19 
Halman 20 | Corinthian 19 | Halman 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 17.1 ft5.21 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.84 m | 2.8 ft0.86 m |
| Displacement | 2,724 lb1,236 kg | 2,500 lb1,134 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,000 lb454 kg |
| Sail area | 193 ft²17.9 m² | 179 ft²16.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.83 | 15.55 |
| Displacement / Length | 399 | 224 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.7 | 14.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.5 |
Corinthian 19 vs Halman 20: the short version
- The Corinthian 19 and Halman 20 are close in length (19.5 ft5.94 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Corinthian 19 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Corinthian 19 carries the more powerful rig (15.8 vs 15.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Corinthian 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corinthian 19 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.