Corinthian 19 vs Hunter 20
How do the Corinthian 19 and Hunter 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Corinthian 19 | Corinthian 19 | Hunter 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 15.5 ft4.72 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.84 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 2,724 lb1,236 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 400 lb181 kg |
| Sail area | 193 ft²17.9 m² | 169 ft²15.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.83 | 18.98 |
| Displacement / Length | 399 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.7 | 10.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 2.51 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.3 |
Corinthian 19 vs Hunter 20: the short version
- The Corinthian 19 and Hunter 20 are close in length (19.5 ft5.94 m vs 19.7 ft6.00 m ).
- The Corinthian 19 is heavier, displacing about 60% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 20 carries the more powerful rig (19.0 vs 15.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Corinthian 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corinthian 19 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.51).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.