Corinthian 19 vs Kelt 550
How do the Corinthian 19 and Kelt 550 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Corinthian 19 
Kelt 550 | Corinthian 19 | Kelt 550 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.5 ft5.94 m | 19.6 ft5.97 m |
| Waterline length | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 17.2 ft5.25 m |
| Beam | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 8.0 ft2.45 m |
| Draft | 2.8 ft0.84 m | 3.6 ft1.10 m |
| Displacement | 2,724 lb1,236 kg | 1,190 lb540 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 193 ft²17.9 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 15.83 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 399 | 104 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.7 | 6.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.86 | 3.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.1 | 5.6 |
Corinthian 19 vs Kelt 550: the short version
- The Corinthian 19 and Kelt 550 are close in length (19.5 ft5.94 m vs 19.6 ft5.97 m ).
- The Corinthian 19 is heavier, displacing about 129% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Corinthian 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Corinthian 19 rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 3.03).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.