Cornish Shrimper 19 vs Paceship 20
How do the Cornish Shrimper 19 and Paceship 20 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cornish Shrimper 19 
Paceship 20 | Cornish Shrimper 19 | Paceship 20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.3 ft5.87 m | 19.3 ft5.87 m |
| Waterline length | 17.6 ft5.36 m | 17.2 ft5.24 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.18 m | 7.8 ft2.36 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.0 ft0.91 m |
| Displacement | 2,348 lb1,065 kg | 800 lb363 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 194 ft²18.0 m² | 155 ft²14.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.57 | 28.78 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 70 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.6 | 4.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 3.34 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Cornish Shrimper 19 vs Paceship 20: the short version
- The Cornish Shrimper 19 and Paceship 20 are close in length (19.3 ft5.87 m vs 19.3 ft5.87 m ).
- The Cornish Shrimper 19 is heavier, displacing about 194% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Paceship 20 carries the more powerful rig (28.8 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cornish Shrimper 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cornish Shrimper 19 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 3.34).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.