Cornish Shrimper 19 vs Rhodes 19
How do the Cornish Shrimper 19 and Rhodes 19 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Cornish Shrimper 19 
Rhodes 19 | Cornish Shrimper 19 | Rhodes 19 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.3 ft5.87 m | 19.2 ft5.84 m |
| Waterline length | 17.6 ft5.36 m | 17.8 ft5.41 m |
| Beam | 7.2 ft2.18 m | 7.0 ft2.13 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 3.3 ft0.99 m |
| Displacement | 2,348 lb1,065 kg | 1,325 lb601 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 428 lb194 kg |
| Sail area | 194 ft²18.0 m² | 167 ft²15.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.57 | 22.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 193 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.6 | 8.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.15 | 2.55 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Cornish Shrimper 19 vs Rhodes 19: the short version
- The Cornish Shrimper 19 and Rhodes 19 are close in length (19.3 ft5.87 m vs 19.2 ft5.84 m ).
- The Cornish Shrimper 19 is heavier, displacing about 77% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Rhodes 19 carries the more powerful rig (22.1 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cornish Shrimper 19 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cornish Shrimper 19 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.55).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.