Coronado 23 vs Coronado 35
How do the Coronado 23 and Coronado 35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Coronado 23 
Coronado 35 | Coronado 23 | Coronado 35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.6 ft6.88 m | 35.3 ft10.74 m |
| Waterline length | 20.1 ft6.12 m | 27.5 ft8.38 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 10.1 ft3.07 m |
| Draft | 3.2 ft0.97 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 2,300 lb1,043 kg | 13,000 lb5,897 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 4,700 lb2,132 kg |
| Sail area | 240 ft²22.3 m² | 454 ft²42.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.04 | 13.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 127 | 279 |
| Comfort ratio | 11.2 | 31.0 |
| Capsize screening | 2.35 | 1.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 7.0 |
Coronado 23 vs Coronado 35: the short version
- The Coronado 35 is the larger boat at 35.3 ft10.74 m LOA versus 22.6 ft6.88 m for the Coronado 23.
- The Coronado 35 is heavier, displacing about 465% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Coronado 23 carries the more powerful rig (22.0 vs 13.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Coronado 35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Coronado 35 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.35).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.